Rejection of duty
credit scrip applications without proper reasoning or a speaking order is
unsustainable.
License expired by
efflux of time invalidates the tenants right to claim protection under the Act.
Failure to deposit the full amount of arrears,
interest, and suit costs leads to eviction under the Rent Act.
Tenants under
unregistered lease agreements cannot frustrate eviction orders by Small Causes
Court through fabricated claims.
A student is entitled
to a scholarship if no intentional misconduct is found, despite discrepancies
in forms or delayed admission cancellation.
Security guards
deployed for property protection have no nexus to the employers core function
and do not constitute an employer employee relationship.
The employer is the
best judge to determine whether experience at a particular company qualifies
for recruitment under specific criteria.
Eligibility criteria
cannot be altered after the selection process has been initiated.
Allegations of judicial
impropriety must be substantiated; misuse of legal proceedings for personal
gain is condemnable.
A candidates
disqualification is valid only if they have an interest in a contract with the
Zilla Parishad and not just the Gram Panchayat.
Failure to issue notice
under Section 11(5) of the MOFA Act vitiates the deemed conveyance process.
A daughters right as a
coparcener under the amended Hindu Succession Act is absolute, irrespective of
her date of birth.
The disciplinary
committee under the IBC can consist of either a single whole-time member or
multiple whole-time members.
Confiscation of
artworks violating contemporary standards of morality must consider artistic
and cultural significance.
Delay
in filing a restoration application must be supported by evidence; lack of
intimation by counsel is not a valid excuse.
Delay applications must
be supported by valid reasoning and necessary documentation.
Dependency proved at
the time of death entitles all claimants to compensation, irrespective of
subsequent employment of one of them.
A plaintiff must
establish consumer confusion with direct evidence; mere similarity is
insufficient.
Legal heirs must
establish their independent necessity for eviction to sustain the claim.
Landlords must
substantiate the necessity for commercial property possession; non-use by a
family member does not establish a bona fide requirement.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer