Conviction set aside
due to contradictions in testimony of victim and relatives, and DNA evidence
failed to connect accused to alleged sexual assault.
Conviction under POCSO
upheld but sentence reduced considering age and surrounding factors.
Inquiry into
disproportionate assets quashed as it continued despite departments denial of consent
and procedural violation.
State directed to
enforce decibel limits on religious loudspeakers; police to use mobile apps for
real-time sound measurement.
Prosecution under IPC
upheld despite prior action under Factories Act; role of manager found active
in negligent act.
Order dismissing
complaint for want of prosecution set aside as complainant had shown diligence
and matter had recently been fixed for evidence.
Proceedings under
Section 138 NI Act quashed as complaint lacked averments showing active
involvement of non-executive director in conduct of companys affairs.
Conviction affirmed
where consistent eyewitness account and weapon recovery proved guilt;
discrepancies immaterial.
Conviction set aside as
High Court erred by relying on inadmissible and uncorroborated evidence,
without proof of motive or recovery linking accused to crime.
Conviction under
Section 302 IPC altered to Section 304 Part-II as fatal injury resulted from
single blow during quarrel caused by grave and sudden provocation.
Conviction set aside as
complainants testimony was unreliable, uncorroborated, and full of
contradictions; presence of accused was doubtful and benefit of doubt was
warranted.
Conviction confirmed as
circumstantial evidence including last seen, recovery of stolen items, and
failure to explain disappearance formed complete chain.
Conviction upheld as
multiple eyewitnesses consistently identified accused and recovery of
blood-stained knife corroborated prosecution case.
Conviction reversed as
circumstantial evidence did not conclusively link accused to offence and failed
to form a complete chain.
Conviction set aside as
injuries were possibly accidental, eyewitness account uncorroborated, and
similarly situated accused were acquitted.
Conviction altered to
Section 304 Part II as testimony of eyewitnesses was unreliable and medical
evidence showed no intention to kill.
Conviction upheld as
accuseds premeditated act of bringing sickle and repeatedly assaulting deceased
showed clear intent to kill.
Conviction altered to
Section 302 r/w Sections 109 and 114 IPC as appellant facilitated crime but did
not directly assault the deceased.
Conviction altered to
Section 304 Part II as post-incident efforts of accused to save his wife
indicated absence of intent to kill though knowledge of consequences was
attributable.
Conviction upheld as
eye-witness testimony and medical evidence including post-mortem report
confirmed fatal head injury caused by blunt object.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer